Dorion Sagan's 1990 paperback Biospheres: Reproducing Planet Earth
(McGraw-Hill Publishing, ISBN 0-553-28883-0) does more than deliver a
unique vision of the planet's life support system. It also challenges
the traditional view of humanity as the dominant feature of life on
Earth.
Perhaps that is no less than should be expected from the
offspring of astronomer Carl Sagan and biologist Lynn Margulis, whose
unorthodox view of evolutionary biology sees life forms merging to
produce new ones. Sagan the younger is well known as an author of books
on culture, evolution, and the philosophy of science.
Ecospheres to Biosphere 2
Among
the more interesting features of the book are the mentions of
still-existing institutions that are unexpectedly abiding features of
the economic and technological landscape.
For example, Ecospheres
Associates in Tucson, Arizona manufactures and sells sealed glass balls
filled with water containing green algae, other microscopic biota, and
tiny shrimp in a symbiotic community that illustrates the principle of
closed life support. It is one illustration of what Sagan calls
"permanently recycling systems." Called EcoSpheres, they come in a
variety of sizes, from 4 inches in diameter to 9 inches, are priced like
small kitchen appliances, and have "replacement periods" of up to a
year. With care, they can last for many years. EcoSpheres are a NASA
spin-off, the first product of US experiments to create closed
ecosystems, ultimately for humans in space habitats.
"Bioshelters",
earthbound biospheres for individuals, families, and small groups, were
a product of the gone-but-not-forgotten New Alchemy Institute
(1969-1991). Between Apollo 11 and Biosphere 2, New Alchemy built
several bioshelters it called "arks" at Cape Cod Massachusetts, Prince
Edward Island (eastern Quebec), and other places. The Green Center at
Hatchville, MA preserves New Alchemy's information legacy.
Ocean
Arcs International, founded by the same people who brought you
bioshelters, created the self-sustaining oceangoing vessels mentioned in
Biospheres. Their idea of sailing Earth's oceans as little sea
colonies, without dependence on anything nonrenewable, including fossil
fuels, has since mutated into a wastewater processing method that might
qualify as a technology for space colonies.
Biosphere 2, 35 miles north of Tucson, was taking shape just as Biospheres
the book was nearing completion. The site has become Southern Arizona's
best-known technological wonder. Situated among the red rocks of the
Santa Catalina Mountains, out of sight of Highway 77 and the ordinary
built environment, it is said that on certain summer evenings under one
of those ruby Arizona sunsets, all of the visual cues are Martian. From
the library tower of the human habitat, across a miniature ocean, rain
forest, desert, savannah, and marshland, Biosphere 2 is 3.14 acres of
Earth under glass. It has operated since 2007 as a research station and
educational outreach project of the University of Arizona under a
ten-year, $30 million grant from the Philecology Foundation.
Of Mice and Men
But
the book has a downside. Its core philosophy is environmentalism, which
is worthy of suspicion because of its tendency to denigrate humanity.
Sagan is at risk for this as well, displaying a fairly consistent
antihuman drumbeat that is easily the most off-putting feature of his
little book.
Each human being, says Sagan, is both a multi-species
assemblage and a unit of a larger organism. The typical Homo sapiens'
surface is inhabited by a microbiological community of bacteria, fungi,
round worms, pin worms, etc. Our guts are densely-packed tubes of
bacteria, yeasts, and other microorganisms. To add further insult, the
Lovelockian view of Gaia, Mother Earth, which Sagan describes
sympathetically, features humans as mere components. It's almost enough
to make one decide to leave all the dirt and non-human DNA behind, and
build strictly artificial worlds, just to prove that we can. Except that
we can't, as anyone who disturbs the equilibrium of their digestive
jungle soon discovers.
Truly, though, there is something
disturbing about the idea, also found here, that the Gaia hypothesis
could become the basis of some new green theocracy. What power would
priests of the green religion have, and to what ends? We find some
indication by the value assigned to individuals in the Lovelockian
philosophy as Sagan portrays it: Individuals are of no consequence. They
are numbers, large amounts of inessential biomass, and those numbers
need to be contained. All of us who do not pass from the scene by means
best left undescribed are to be midwives in the reproduction of the
original biosphere, creating isolated cocoons of life in space, or maybe
not. Right there, Sagan loses his clarity of vision. He thinks maybe we
should just build protective pods to shield the offspring of Mother
Earth from her dying body. OK. That's a little weird. Also, that's
enough bashing of Men for their reproductive proclivities. I happen to
like people, at least in principle.
Sagan says we ALL like people,
and not just in principle. We like them so much that we are on the way
to becoming a superorganism made up of individual humans the way our
bodies are made of cells. To prevent these "cells" from reproducing
wildly into superorganism "tumors", Sagan feels we shall adopt new
cultural norms like infanticide and abortion, maybe also a little
criminality and sexual perversion. Before too long, by way of
demonstrating the effects of crowding, he works his way around to the
rodent experiments of Dr. John B. Calhoun. If one takes the results at
face value and allows them to be projected upon the human future, then,
as Sagan points out, only grim conclusions are possible.
Sagan
would have done well to point out that the standard interpretation of
Calhoun's results is not necessarily the best one. The mouse "universes"
of John Calhoun's creation did become crowded over time (though never
reaching more than about 80% of capacity). They were also closed from
the start, making emigration impossible. Population biologists regard
emigration and death in the same light. That is because they are unable
to follow individuals once they leave a controlled area. But, as any
human explorer knows, emigration and death are not the same thing. A
more complete interpretation of Calhoun's outcomes reflects the
impossibility of a breakout, concluding that the mouse populations
failed, not because they were dense, but because they were trapped in an
enclosure.
Such side trips down depressing rabbit holes explain
why the book in some ways stumbles rather than soars. Not until near the
end do we again take up the ennobling view of Man the Builder of Worlds
as opposed to Man trapped inside some kind of planet-sized monster in
space. We pick up the thread at the Soviet Bios program of the early
1980s, which maintained two human beings in a complete life support
system independent of Earth for a five-month simulated space journey.
Biospherians
Ten
years later than Bios, much bigger, and more Capitalist, Biosphere 2 is
a significant extension of the theme Sagan tries to express. A project
of Edward P. Bass's Decisions Investments (as Space Biospheres
Ventures), it is the largest and most complete simulation of the earth
ever undertaken. The apparatus is as much a technological object as a
biological one. Its basement "technosphere" includes systems for
controlling temperature, filtering water, balancing internal pressure,
fighting fires, and supporting the scientific activities of eight
"biospherians." It is also art, a self-portrait of Man in the late
twentieth century. Like the book, Biosphere 2 is more of a quest than a
destination. Both are pearls, not so much because of what they say, or
fail to say, or how they say it, but because of the questions they
raise, most notably, "Who are we?"
0 comments:
Post a Comment